The recent article discussion regarding temporary housing in Ohio County following the flood highlights the critical need for swift and effective solutions. While Bequall’s proposal for modular Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), or “tiny homes,” offers potential long-term benefits, it’s crucial to consider why temporary RV housing using travel trailer presents a more immediate, flexible, and often cost-effective alternative, especially in the immediate aftermath of a disaster.
The article emphasizes the “lasting power” and “experience for people who have to live there over time” as advantages of ADUs over recreational vehicles. However, for a community grappling with displaced families, the priority shifts to rapid deployment and accessibility.
Here’s why temporary RV housing can be a superior solution in such scenarios:
Cost-Effectiveness:
- Lower Initial Investment: Many RV’s are available to rent, like www.rvrentalhousing.com. For purchase, RVs generally have a significantly lower purchase price compared to tiny homes. This lower entry point makes them more accessible for immediate, large-scale deployment.
- Easier Financing and Insurance: RVs are a well-regulated vehicle type, making them comparatively easier to finance and insure than tiny homes, which can face complexities due to their newer market segment and varying zoning regulations.
- Reduced Site Preparation: While ADUs require a foundation and site preparation akin to traditional homes, RVs can often be parked in existing RV parks or on suitable private land with minimal setup, reducing immediate infrastructure costs and delays for the county.
Superior Mobility and Rapid Deployment:
- Designed for Travel: Unlike tiny homes, which are essentially houses on wheels and not designed for frequent relocation (often requiring special wide load permits, specific routes to avoid bridges and low electrical lines, and large trucks potentially accompanied by flashing light cars or truck caravans), RVs are built for frequent travel. They are more aerodynamic and constructed with lighter materials, making them far easier and less expensive to transport.
- Immediate Availability: As the article notes, Bequall’s ADUs could be set up in “about 30 days.” In contrast, RVs can be deployed almost immediately. They are “ready to go” and can be set up and used without the weeks of planning and preparation often required for traditional housing or even modular tiny homes. This “quick setup and immediate use” is paramount when families are still in
In conclusion, while tiny homes offer a compelling vision for long-term housing solutions, the immediate and pressing need for temporary shelter after a disaster strongly favors RV housing due to its lower cost, superior mobility, and rapid deployment capabilities. These factors make RVs an invaluable resource for providing immediate relief and stability to displaced families.
Article Referenced: https://www.theintelligencer.net/news/top-headlines/2025/08/ohio-county-officials-exploring-temporary-housing-for-flood-victims/
